Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX
