Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
