Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
70.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX
Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX
Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X