Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
64.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
