Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX
