Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
65.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
