Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
65.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 7 and a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
