Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Nzon Distance 25, left and right hand, Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10133-325
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Feeder And Match
52.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight530g / 18.7oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €78.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size-
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €17.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m

Conclusion

Both Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag stands out for a weight of 260g / 9.17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?

There are not much differences between the two comparables