Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Feeder And Match
52.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight530g / 18.7oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €78.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Delphin REDIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
