Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
