Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX
