Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
