Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX
