Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
