Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Mitchell 308 2000X
