Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05 lbs) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX
