Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05 lbs) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin YUPIE


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Delphin REDIX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Delphin YUPIE
