Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
73.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa Freams LT?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R
