Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa GS LTD
Spinning
27.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.66 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €83.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/220
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Daiwa GS LTD 3000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Daiwa GS LTD 3000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa GS LTD?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa GS LTD 3000X
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
