Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa GS LTD
Spinning
27.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.66 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €83.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/220
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Daiwa GS LTD 3000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Daiwa GS LTD 3000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa GS LTD?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa GS LTD 3000X
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX
