Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Conclusion
Both Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, durability and line retrieve per crank. If you must choose between them, Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X
