Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin RAYA body
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Delphin RAYA body
Feeder And Match
44.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.63 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight584g / 20.6oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size55 Y
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/400
Conclusion
Both Delphin RAYA body and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, durability and line retrieve per crank. If you must choose between them, Delphin RAYA body offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Delphin RAYA body?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Delphin RAYA body
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (7), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
