Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
