Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X
