Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750, QC 750, Spinning Angelrolle, Frontbremse, 10431-175
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €22.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeQC 750
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Penn 2020 Clash II , 1000, left and right hand, Saltwater Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1522155
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

  • BrandPENN
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €177.40
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size1000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Conclusion

Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and total score (6.77 out of 10). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Penn 2020 Clash II?

Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X

  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.