Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
