Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750, QC 750, Spinning Angelrolle, Frontbremse, 10431-175
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €22.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeQC 750
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Shimano FX , 1000 FC, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, FX1000FC
Shimano FX
Spinning
46.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €18.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size1000 FC
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Conclusion

Both Shimano FX 1000 FCX and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, line retrieve per crank and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano FX 1000 FCX offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.

What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano FX?

Shimano FX 1000 FCX

  • A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers