Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Solid value at €22.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
