Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
