Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX
