Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
86.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight2445g / 86.25oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50WLRSA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Tiagra?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
- Scoring 8.87 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
