Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
85.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.5:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight3265g / 115.17oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €779.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80WA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 80WAX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tiagra 80WAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Tiagra?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H
