Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X
