Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX
