Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
