Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 2500 R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in ergonomics, while Shimano Sahara 2500 R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX
