Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 2500 R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in ergonomics, while Shimano Sahara 2500 R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X
