Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 2500 R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in ergonomics, while Shimano Sahara 2500 R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
