Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 2500 R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in ergonomics, while Shimano Sahara 2500 R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
