Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750

Spinning

43.90 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.54 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €22.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeQC 750
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI

Spinning

52.60 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 SFI
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Conclusion

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) and line retrieve per crank (73cm / 28.74 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI?

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73cm / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues