Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750

Spinning

43.90 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.54 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €22.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeQC 750
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Spinning

68.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000 HG
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Conclusion

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (91cm / 35.83 inch) and ball bearings (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues