Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
73.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa Freams LT?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
