Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82cm / 32.28 inch) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X
