Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82cm / 32.28 inch) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
