Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and durability (5.73 out of 10). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
