Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
86.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €519.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16IIA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 30/275
Conclusion
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica II 16IIAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Talica II?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
