Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750

Spinning

47.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.71 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €32.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeQR 750
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Twin Power FE

Spinning

76.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.56 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio6.4:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €389.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000XGFE
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Twin Power FE?

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X

Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers