Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
