Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
