Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX
