Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX
