Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
