Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
