Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa RX LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Delphin INKS 6000X
