Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
