Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R
