Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
