Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
57.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/200

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and ball bearings (8). While Daiwa RX LT 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)?
Daiwa RX LT 2500X
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (8), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
