Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
57.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Daiwa RX LT 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa RX LT 2500X offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX
