Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
57.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa RX LT 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa RX LT 2500X offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
