Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch, while Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R stands out for a gear ratio of 4.9:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R?
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- With a premium bearing count of 3 scoring 5 out of 10, our reel offers a high-end smoothness and durability, ready for all different environments
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX


Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 5000X
