Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 40X

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight340g / 11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/500
Conclusion
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 40X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin HORNET 40X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin HORNET 40X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
