Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 50X

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400
Conclusion
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin HORNET 50X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
