Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440
Conclusion
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
