Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440
Conclusion
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX
